REGIONAL SETTLEMENT SYSTEMS AND TERRITORIES WITH PREFERENTIAL MODES: INTERACTION AND DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES

The presence in the newest Russian urban planning practice of special objects of professional activity - local urbanized formations is revealed. Their appearance is due to the adoption of new regulatory legal acts in various sectors of activity, significantly expanding the scope of the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation. They establish general requirements for the formation of territories with preferential development regimes and their subsequent use, which contain the prerequisites for significant changes in the state of territorial objects and their systems. However, to date, they are not fully used either at the stage of developing urban planning documentation, or at the stage of its implementation. Urban planning practice indicates the need to establish the relationship between the properties and characteristics of regional systems of settlements and local formations, depending on environmental factors. As a result of the analysis and systematization of modern experience in the implementation of projects for the development of local territories, the influence of the activity of their urban development on the parameters of the functioning of regional systems has been established. The revealed dependence is proposed to be used in the development of model schemes for the reorganization of regional systems, which characterize their susceptibility to the emergence of new centers of urban development. The expediency of using the developed theoretical models in the process of improving the methodology of territorial planning has been substantiated. Purposeful planning of local territories in settlement systems is presented as forecasting the emergence of new foci of development through a comprehensive assessment and consideration of the available resource potential. Thus, it ensures the regulated development of the territory. This is expressed in the achievement of the predicted parameters of changes in the state of regional settlement systems, corresponding to the conditions and requirements of their functioning. The main difference between the proposed methodology and traditional approaches lies in the simultaneous provision of the stability of the formed spatial structures and the innovation of the forms of regional systems due to the activity of local formations.

territories with preferential regimes, local urbanized formations, regional settlement systems, functioning parameters, systems for the development of urban planning solutions, territorial planning

1. Теличенко В.И., Щербина Е.В. Социально-природно-техногенная система устойчивой среды жизнедеятельности // Промышленное и гражданское строительство. 2019. № 6. С. 5-12. DOI:10.33622/0869-7019.2019.06.5-12

2. Shcherbina E., Gorbenkova E. Smart city technologies for sustainable rural development // IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018. Vol. 365. P. 022039. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/365/2/022039

3. Michalka L., Kovac B. A New Tool of Urban Stability and Development in Spatial Planning // IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. Vol. 471. № 092046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092046

4. Донцов Д.Г., Юшкова Н.Г. Градостроительное регулирование рационального использования территории // Волгоград : Изд-во ВолгГАСУ, 2007. 184 с

5. Ильичев В.А., Емельянов С.Г., Колчунов В.И., Бакаева Н.В. Инновационные технологии в строительстве городов. Биосферная совместимость и человеческий потенциал. АВС. 2019. 208 с

6. Ильичев В.А., Каримов А.М., Колчунов В.И., Алексашина В.В., Бакаева Н.В., Кобелева С.А. Предложения к доктрине градоустройства и расселения (стратегического планирования городов) // Жилищное строительство. 2012. №1. С. 2-11

7. Бакаева Н.В., Чайковская Л.В., Кормина А.А. Градоустройство как комплексная деятельность по созданию социально-ориентированной городской среды // Биосферная совместимость: человек, регион, технологии. 2019. № 1(25). C.94-107. DOI: 10.21869/23-11-1518-2019-25-1-94-106

8. Бакаева Н.В., Черняева И.В. К задачам нормирования комфортности и безопасности среды жизнедеятельности города// Строительство и реконструкция 2020. №1 (87). С. 101-112. DOI: 10.33979/2073-7416-2020-87-1-101-112

9. Шубенков М.В., Шубенкова М.Ю. К вопросу поиска сбалансированного сосуществования природных и урбанизированных территорий // Биосферная совместимость: человек, регион, технологии. 2019. № 3. С.3-17

10. Птичникова Г.А. Устойчивое развитие городов на принципах биосферной совместимости с природным комплексом // Innovative Project. 2016. Т. 1. № 4 (4). С. 112-116

11. Алексеев Ю.В. Подход к оценке эволюции научных проблем в системе управления градостроительной деятельностью // Архитектура и Строительство России. 2015. №4 (232). С. 16-21

12. Shubenkov M.V, Mityagin S.D, Gaevskaya Z.A. The sixth technological revolution in construction industry: Noospheric paths //Advances in Energy and Environment Research: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Energy and Environment Research (ICAEER2016), Guangzhou City, China, August 12-14, 2016, Tylor & Francis Group, FL 33487-2742 CRC Press 2017. P. 129-134

13. Yenin A.E., Liventceva A.V. System approach in urban planning. History. General foundations // Russian journal of building construction and architecture. 2017. No. 1 (33). P. 91--101

14. Dontsov D.G., Yushkova N.G. Principles of sustainable development of the territory and priorities of architectural and urban construction activity // AIP Conference Proceedings. 2017. Vol. 1800. Issue 1. № 050011. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4973071

15. Telichenko V.I., Benuzh A.A. Evaluation of Russia’s innovation activity levels in construction // Civil Engineering and Urban Planning IV - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Civil Engineering and Urban Planning (CEUP). 2015. P. 677-680

16. Kolyasnikov V.A. Strategy of spatial development in urban planning Russia // IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 962. 2020. 032033 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/962/3/032033

17. Украинский В.Н. Формирование систем регионального развития: зарубежный опыт // Регионалистика. 2018. Т. 5. № 1. С. 31-40. DOI: 10.14530/reg.2018.1.31

18. Moulaert F., Sekia F. Territorial innovation models: a critical survey // Regional Studies. 2003. Vol. 37(3). P. 289-302

19. Jabareen Y. Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk // Cities. 2013. Vol. 31. P. 220-229

20. Jabareen Y.R. Sustainable Urban Forms: Their Typologies, Models and Concepts. J. Plan. Educ. 2006. Res. 26. P. 38-52

21. Smilka V.A. “Detection of reflexive signs in town planning systems of Ukraine and Republic of Belarus” // Science and Technique. 2018. Vol. 17(2). P. 123-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2018-17-2-123-129

22. Kamrowska-Załuska D. Role of integrated transport system in comprehensive, polycentric development of Gdansk Bay Metropolitan Area // Urban Development. 2017. Vol. 54(2). P. 35-41. https ://doi.org/10.1515/udi-2017-0010

23. Kamrowska-Załuska D., Obracht-Prondzyńska H. Urban regeneration in urban functional areas in Poland as an instrument of implementation of the EU Cohesion Policy // Growth and Change. 2020. Vol. 51. P. 278-301. https : doi.org/10.1111/grow.12361

24. Алексеев Ю.В. Подход к организации и формированию новой системы и структуры нормативно-технических документов для освоения подземного пространства» // Градостроительство. 2012. № 5. С. 68-74

25. Пространственно-стратегическое развитие территории / В.Н. Кабанов, Д.Г. Донцов, Н.Г. Юшкова, Е.В. Михайлова // Волгогр. гос. аграр. ун-т. Волгоград. 2018. 276 с

26. Yushkova N.G. Improvement of tool support of the spatial approach to regional planning: problems, specifics, trends // Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2014.Vol. 6 (36). P. 225-242

27. Швецов А.Н. Роль государства в преобразовании социоэкономического пространства // Пространственная экономика. 2015. № 1. С. 38-61

28. Швецов А.Н., Демьяненко А.Н., Украинский В.Н. Деструктивные стереотипы российского стратегического планирования и их возможные последствия для практики регионального стратегирования (часть 1) // Регионалистика. 2016. Т. 3. № 3. С. 48-60

29. Yushkova N.G., Gushchina E.G., Dontsov D.G., Fikhtner O.А. Spatial development dichotomy: assessment of the potential and implementation of territorial systems // The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences. 2019. Vol. 77. P. 792-803. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.05.97

30. Wang Jin. The economic impact of Special Economic Zones: Evidence from Chinese municipal-ities // Journal of Development Economics. 2013. Vol. 101. P. 133 - 147

31. Aggarwal A. Impact of Special Economic Zones on Employment, Povetry and Human Development // Indian Counsil foe Research on International Economic Relations. 2007. Vol. 194. P. 61

32. Graboviy P. Reconstruction and modernization of industrial parks // Topical Problems of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Environmental Economics (TPACEE 2018): E3S Web of Conferences (2 April 2019). 2019. Vol. 91. № 147. 08028. P. 8. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199108028

33. Иншаков О.В., Иншакова Е.И., Крюкова Е.В. Особые экономические зоны как институт развития // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 3. Экономика. Экология. 2014. № 6 (29). С. 81-95

34. Leonov S.N. Preferential regimes of established local growth points and its impact on the economy of the Far East // Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2020. Vol. 13. No. 3. P. 28-45. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.3.69.3

35. Yushkova N.G. Local urban-planning formations as a foundation for reorganizing regional systems of settlement: prerequisites for developing the methodology // Russian Journal of Building Construction and Architecture. 2020. Issue № 3 (47). no. 1 (33). P. 76--90. DOI 10.36622/VSTU.2020.59.3.008