RESTRUCTURING IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND TRANSFORMATION OF THE URBAN SPACE OF THE METROPOLIS
https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7416-2021-93-1-134-139
Abstract
The article considers the developed model of the closed-cycle economy, which, along with economic parameters, takes into account pollution and consumption of building materials suitable for recycling. The model reflects the idea that the economic growth of a society alone cannot maintain or improve the existing quality of the environment, and for this it is necessary to increase the recycling rate. The purpose of the study is to reveal the factors influencing the increase in the level of recycling when introducing efficient and environmentally friendly systems for managing construction waste in megacities. The results of the study will affect the improvement of the quality and standards of life of the city population, the creation of favorable conditions for a safe, healthy and the prosperous life of people while ensuring the economic growth of the city. The process of the managing the growing volume of construction waste is reflected, recycling is emphasized.
About the Author
Anton A. Stepanenko
AOCHU VO "Moscow Financial and Legal University "MFLA
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Желтобрюхова В.Ф., Рыбальского Н.Г., Яковлева А.С. Деятельность по обращению с опасными отходами: в 2-х тт. / под общ. ред. М.: РЭФИА, 2003. Т. 2. 444 с
2. Джексон К., Уоткин Е. «Мусорная» политика ЕС: инструменты контроля // Твердые бытовые отходы. 2013. № 1 (79). С. 54-57
3. Тихоцкая И.С. Япония: Инновационный подход к управлению ТБО // Твердые бытовые отходы. 2013. № 6 (84). С. 52-57
4. Цховребов Э.С., Четвертаков Г.В., Шканов С.И. Экологическая безопасность в строительной индустрии. М.: Альфа-М, 2014. 304 с
5. Цховребов Э.С., Величко Е.Г. Вопросы охраны окружающей среды и здоровья человека в процессе обращения строительных материалов // Строительные материалы. 2014. № 5. С. 99-103
6. Губенко В.К., Лямзин А.А., Помазков М.В., Губенко О.В. Логистика отходов в мегаполисе // Материалы II Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. Киев: Мин. транс. и связи Украины, 2009. 200 с
7. Akers J., Seymour Er. Instrumental exploitation: Predatory property relations at city’s end, Geoforum, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.022, 91. 127-140. 2018
8. Celik N., Antmann E., Shi X., Hayton B. Simulation-based optimization for planning of effective waste reduction, diversion, and recycling programs // Proc. of the 2015 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference. Режим доступа: http://www.coe. iami.edu/celik/swmwebsite/publications/Y1_ConferencePaper_I.pdf
9. Chow G.C. China’s economic transformation (2nd ed.). London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2017
10. Davarian L., Baldwin, Emma S. Crane, Cities, Racialized Poverty, and Infrastructures of Possibility, Antipode, 10.1111/anti.12600, 52, 2. 365-379. 2020
11. Deng F.F., Huang, Y. Uneven land reform and urban sprawl in China: the case of Beijing. Progress in Planning, 61, 211-236. 2014
12. Ding C.R. Urban spatial development in the land policy reform era: evidence from Beijing. Urban Studies, 41, 1889-1907. 2014
13. Dupont V. Conflicting stakes and governance in the peripheries of large Indian metropolises - an introduction. Cities, 24(2), 89-94. 2017
14. George DAR, Lin BC-A, Chen Y. A circular economy model of economic growth. Environmental Modelling & Software 73: 60-63. 2015
15. Gilad S., Alon-Barkat S., Chagai M. Weiss, Bureaucratic politics and the translation of movement agendas, Governance, 10.1111/gove.12383,32,2.369 -385. 2018
16. Heyer J., Palm M., Niemeier D. Are we keeping up? Accessibility, equity and air quality in regional planning, Journal of Transport Geography, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo. 2020.102891,89. 02891. 2020
17. Ichinose D. Yamamoto M. and Yoshida Y. The decoupling of affluence and waste discharge under spatial correlation: Do richer communities discharge more waste? Environment and Development Economics 20:161-184. 2014
18. Kemeny T., Osman T. The wider impacts of high-technology employment: Evidence from U.S. cities, Research Policy, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.005, 47, 9. 1729-1740. 2018
19. Mattiuzzi E. The role of county-level agencies in coordinating local climate planning in California, Transportation, Land Use, and Environmental Planning, 10.1016/B97-0-12-815167-9.00021-9. 469-495. 2020
20. Nixon J.D., Wright D.G., Dey P.K., Ghosh S.K., Davies P.A. A comparative assessment of waste incinerators in the UK // Waste Management. No. 33. P. 2234-2244. 2013
21. Pacewicz J. The Political Economy of the Capitalist State, The New Handbook of Political Sociology, 10.1017/9781108147828. 409-434. 2020
22. Vahdani B., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R., Baboli A., Mousavi S. A new fuzzy math-ematical model in recycling collection networks: a possibilistic approach // World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. No. 78. P. 45-49. 2013
Review
For citations:
Stepanenko A.A. RESTRUCTURING IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND TRANSFORMATION OF THE URBAN SPACE OF THE METROPOLIS. Building and Reconstruction. 2021;(1):134-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7416-2021-93-1-134-139
Views:
112
Email this article 