TESTING OF REINFORCED LARGE-SCALE MASONRY SAMPLES
https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7416-2025-122-6-1
Abstract
The massive restoration of buildings and structures after seismic impacts and in combat zones with the characteristic consequences of mine and explosive damage requires particularly effective methods of strengthening structures, which necessitates the development of appropriate regulatory and methodological justifications for these techniques. These solutions should primarily be based on experimental studies conducted on field samples close to real samples, and impacts that also correspond to actual structural loading patterns. In this regard, it becomes a question of choosing test methods, taking into account important factors in this case: repeatability and similarity, as well as the possibility of scaling if it is impossible to conduct tests on samples with dimensions close to real ones. The issues discussed in this article are devoted to the choice of methods for testing masonry structures after damage caused by equivalent seismic and mine-explosive effects, and a specific test proposal has been developed.
About the Authors
Ol. V. Kabancev
National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kabantsev Oleg V., Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Reinforced Concrete and Stone Structures
Moscow
Ol. A. Simakov
National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Simakov Oleg A., Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Reinforced Concrete and Stone Structures
Moscow
Le Vo Phu Toan
National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Le Vo Phu Toan, Postgraduate student of the Department of Reinforced Concrete and Stone Structures
Moscow
References
1. ElGawady M. A., Lestuzzi P., Badoux M. Retrofitting of Masonry Walls Using Shotcrete. Proc. NZSEE Conference. 2006.
2. Eremenok P.L., Izmailov Yu.V. Monolitnost i sejsmostojkost konstrukcij iz estestvennogo kamnya [Solidity and earthquake resistance of natural stone structures]. Chisinau, 1968. 202 p. (rus).
3. Gurevich A.M., Maloglazov B.I., Rasskazovsky V.T. Kompleksnye konstrukcii sten so sborno-monolitnymi serdechnikami [Complex wall structures with prefabricated monolithic cores]. Construction and architecture of Uzbekistan. 1970. No. 2. Pp. ... (rus).
4. Izmailov Yu.V., Burovenko V.A., Kirpiy A.F. Usilenie zdanij, povrezhdennyh zemletryaseniem [Reinforcement of buildings damaged by the earthquake]. The Carpathian earthquake of 1986. Ed. Drumia A.V., Shebalina N.V., Skladneva N.N., Grafova S.S., Oizerman V.I. Chisinau, 1990. Pp. 303-317. (rus).
5. Kabantsev O.V., Tamrazyan A.G. Modeling of elastic-plastic deformation of masonry under conditions of biaxial stress state. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering. 2015. Vol. 11. Iss. 3. Pp. 87–100. (rus).
6. Kabantsev O.V. A discrete model of masonry under conditions of biaxial stress state. Vestnik of TSUAB. 2015. No. 4. Pp. 113–134. (rus).
7. Kabantsev O.V., Tonkikh G.P., Simakov O.A., Simakov A.B., Baev S.M. Povyshenie sejsmostojkosti kamennyh konstrukcij odnostoronnimi applikaciyami iz torkret-betona [Increasing the seismic resistance of stone structures by single-sided applications of shotcrete]. Airports. Advanced technologies. 2011. No. 2. Pp. 26-32. (rus).
8. Kabantsev O.V., Tonkich G.P. et al. The Grant according to seismic stability and to seismo-strengthening the general armies buildings with bearing walls from a stone laying. Moscow, 26 TSNII MO the Russian Federation, 2002.
9. Malcev A.M. Osnovy zhelezobetonnogo stroitelstva [Fundamentals of reinforced concrete construction]. Moscow: Transpechat NKPS, 1929. (rus).
10. Martemyanov A.I., Shirin V.V. Sposoby vosstanovleniya zdanij i sooruzhenij, povrezhdennyh zemletryaseniem [Methods of restoring buildings and structures damaged by an earthquake]. Moscow, 1978. 204 p. (rus).
11. Polyakov S.V. Sejsmostojkie konstrukcii zdanij (osnovy teorii sejsmostojkosti) [Earthquake-resistant structures of buildings (fundamentals of the theory of seismic resistance)]. Moscow, 1983. 304 p. (rus).
12. Polyakov S.V., Konovodchenko V.I. Strength and deformation of vibro-brick panels during skewing. Earthquake resistance of prefabricated large-element buildings. Moscow, 1963. Pp. 131-148.
13. Polyakov S.V., Sadykhov Z.G. Prochnost i deformacii sploshnyh vibro-kamennyh panelej pri perekose [Strength and deformation of continuous vibrating wall panels during skewing]. Earthquake resistance of prefabricated large-element buildings. Moscow, 1963. Pp. 170-183. (rus).
14. Polyakov S.V., Safargaliev S.M. Monolitnost kamennoj kladki [Monolithic masonry]. Alma Ata, 1991. 160 p. (rus).
15. Simakov O.A. Analysis of factors causing the need for strengthening of reinforced concrete constructions. Building and Reconstruction. 2019. No. 1(81). Pp. 76-84. https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7416-2019-81-1-76-84 (rus).
16. Tonkikh G.P., Kabantsev O.V., Simakov O.A., Simakov A.B., Baev S.M., Panfilov P.S. Eksperimentalnye issledovaniya sejsmousileniya kamennoj kladki naruzhnymi betonnymi applikaciyami [Experimental studies of seismic reinforcement of masonry by external concrete applications]. Earthquake-resistant construction. Safety of structures. 2011. No. 2. Pp. 35-42. (rus).
17. Zhunusov T.J. Osnovy sejsmostojkogo stroitelstva [Fundamentals of earthquake-resistant construction]. Alma Ata, 1990. 270 p. (rus).
Review
For citations:
Kabancev O.V., Simakov O.A., Toan L. TESTING OF REINFORCED LARGE-SCALE MASONRY SAMPLES. Building and Reconstruction. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7416-2025-122-6-1
Views:
25
Email this article 