Infrastructural prerequisites for the spatial development of the Irkutsk region as part of the Angara-Yenisei macroregion
https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7416-2024-114-4-105-121
Abstract
In Siberia the urban development along the railways and navigable rivers dominates totally. The problem of “transport-settlement” is considered on specific materials of the Angara-Yenisei macroregion of interzonal type. The construction of the North Siberian Railway will create an additional resource for improving the settlement structure of the Near North zone based on the idea of the "basic city - shift method", formed in Soviet times. The use of such forms of spatial organization of the Lower Angara region production facilities as clusters and the Middle Angara region as territories of advanced development is the characteristic of the innovative economy. This peculiarity will allow forming the framework of a settlement system founded on basic settlements formed from the existing cities.
Promising forms of transformation of the existing settlement structure of the Angara-Yenisei macroregion are proposed, which is based on the concept of forming interzonal systems providing for both external and internal centralized shift and expeditionary settlement in the north of the Irkutsk Region and the Krasnoyarsk Territory.
About the Authors
L. V. Glebushkina
Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Glebushkina Lyudmila V., сandidate of technical science, associated professor of the department of building structures
Tyumen
A. E. Tokarev
Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tokarev Alexey E., associated professor of the department of building structures
Tyumen
References
1. Yushkova N.G. Regional settlement systems and territories with preferential regimes: principles of interaction and development. Building and reconstruction. 2021. No.4(96) - Pp. 91-106. https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7416-2021-95-3-91-106. (rus.)
2. Fauzer V.V., Lytkina T.S., Fauzer G.N. Differentiation of the Arctic territories by the degree of settlement and economic development. Arctic: Ecology and Economics. 2017. No.4 (28). - Pp. 18-31.(rus.)
3. Kolesnikov A. A. Urban planning design of the Baikal territory. Project Baikal. 2019. No.74. Pp. 138-142. URL: https://doi.org/10.51461/pb.74.23. (rus.)
4. Chebanenko B.B., Maisyuk E.P. Baikal region: limits of stability. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2002. 160 p. 5. Krotov V.A., Filshin G.I. Problems of complex development of the Angara-Yenisei region. Irkutsk: printing house No.1, 1974. - 28 p.(rus.)
5. Tkachenko V.YA. Percev V.P. Suhoputnyj transport Sibiri: formirovanie opornoj seti zheleznyh i avtomobilnyh dorog. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2003. 312 p.(rus.)
6. Golts G.A. Transport i rasselenie. M.: Nauka, 1981. 248 p.(rus.)
7. Eckersten S., Balfors B. Exploring practices for facilitating integrated strategic land use and transport planning in the Nordic countries. The Journal of Transport and Land Use. 2023. Vol. 16 No. 1. Pp. 409–435. https://dx.doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2023.2350
8. Peretolchina L.V., Glebushkina L.V., Shestakov A.V. Gradostroitelnye predposylki prostranstvennogo razvitiya territorii Angaro-Enisejskogo makroregiona Izvestiya vuzov. Investicii. Stroitel'stvo. Nedvizhimost. 2019. No9(4) Pp. 858-870. URL: https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2019-4-858-870.(rus.)
9. Glebushkina L.V., Peretolchina L.V. Vliyanie struktury territorialnoj sistemy rasseleniya interzonalnogo tipa na razvitie Angaro-Enisejskogo makroregiona. Izvestiya vuzov. Investicii. Stroitel'stvo. Nedvizhimost'. 2023. No.2.- Pp. 378-397. URL: https://elibrary/ru/qaoocw.https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2023-2-378-397.(rus.)
10. Duman, O., Mäntysalo, R., Granqvist, K., Johnson, E., & Ronikonmäki, N.-M. Challenges in land use and transport planning integration in Helsinki metropolitan region. A historical-institutional perspective. Sustainability. 2022. No.14(1), p. 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010146
11. Lee, J.; Arts, J.; Vanclay, F. Stakeholder views about Land Use and Transport Integration in a rapidly-growing megacity: Social outcomes and integrated planning issues in Seoul. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, No.67, 102759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102759
12. Prokofeva T.A., Goncharenko S.S. Stroitelstvo Severo-Sibirskoj magistrali – odin iz glavnyh prioritetov razvitiya transportnoj sistemy Sibiri i ekonomiki Rossii v celom .V Centre ekonomiki. – 2020. – No.3. – Pp. 5-31.(rus.)
13. Pleslov A.A. Novye infrastrukturnye faktory razvitiya Irkutskoj oblasti i sopredelnyh regionov. Rossijskoe predprinimatelstvo. 2018. No.4. - Pp. 965-976.(rus.)
14. Bezrukov L. A. Osobennosti territorialnoj hozyajstvenno-rasselencheskoj struktury i perspektivy prostranstvennogo razvitiya Sibiri. Science studies. Scientific journal. 2014. Pp. 6(25). DOI: 10.15862/05EVN614, URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/index.php?p=issue-6-14 (rus.)
15. Blagodeleva O.M. Evolyuciya i sovremennye tendencii razvitiya sistem rasseleniya v rajonah Severa (na primere SSHA, Kanady i Rossii). Bulletin of Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Applied ecology. Urbanistics. 2017. No.3. Pp. 5-25. DOI: 10.15593/2409-5125/2017.03.01.(rus.)
16. Shishatsky N.G. Prospects for the development of northern and Arctic regions within the framework of the Yenisei Siberia megaproject. Arctic and North. 2018. - No.33. - Pp. 66-90. DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.33.66
Review
For citations:
Glebushkina L.V., Tokarev A.E. Infrastructural prerequisites for the spatial development of the Irkutsk region as part of the Angara-Yenisei macroregion. Building and Reconstruction. 2024;(4):105-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7416-2024-114-4-105-121
Views:
88
Email this article 