MODELING OF IMPACTS ON STEEL FRAMES OF BUILDINGS ON A DEFORMABLE SOIL BASE
https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7416-2023-108-4-106-118
Abstract
The article focuses on the currently relevant problem of assessing the safety of steel frame systems on a deformable soil base under accidental impacts. The article considers a case when impact actions can be random, i.e., such parameters as application point, direction and intensity of impact are not determined preliminarily. It is supposed that for the existing design solution the occurrence of such impacts should not lead to progressive collapse, and the structure as a whole should have the property of robustness. In order to estimate this property, it is suggested to carry out a number of calculations for the stress-strain state under the most dangerous random loads and then to carry out a verification analysis in the dynamic statement. For the steel frame, a search problem is solved according to the criterion of minimization of integral safety margin of structural elements. The calculations account for the possibility to prevent the frame buckling. The quasi-static analysis is performed on the basis of the models of the deformation theory of plasticity, and the dynamic analysis is done with regard to the associated law of steel yielding. The proposed procedures allow designing steel frame structures which are resistant to random accidental loads. A shock load is represented in the form of a force impulse which is statically equivalent to the dynamic effect of an inelastic impact of a rigid body on a structural system. An example of design and performance evaluation of a steel frame structure of a two-story building is considered.
About the Authors
N. S. Kurchenko
National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kurchenko Natalia S., candidate in technical sciences, associate professor of the department of Reinforced Concrete and Stone Structures
Moscow
S. Yu. Savin
National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Savin Sergey Yu., candidate in technical sciences, associate professor, associate professor of the department of Reinforced Concrete and Stone Structures
Moscow
References
1. Tur A.V., Tur V.V., Lizahub A.A. Experimental and theoretical study of the reinforced concrete flat slabs with the central support loss. Building and reconstruction. 2023. Vol. 105. No. 1. Pр. 77–103.
2. Travush V.I., Kolchunov V.I., Klyueva N.V. Some directions of development of survivability theory of structural systems of buildings and structures. r shlenn e i Gra h ansk e Str itel’st . 2015. No. 3. Pр. 4–11.
3. Tamrazyan A.G., Popov D.S. Stress-strain state of corrosion-damaged reinforced concrete elements under dynamic loading. r shlenn e i Gra h ansk e Str itel’st . 2019. No. 2. Pр. 19–26.
4. Kabantsev O., Mitrovic B. Deformation and power characteristics monolithic reinforced concrete bearing systems in the mode of progressive collapse. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018. Vol. 251. Pр. 02047.
5. Alekseytsev A.V. Stability of the RC Column under Horizontal Impacts. Reinforced concrete structures. 2023. Vol. 2. No. 2. Pр. 3–12.
6. Alekseytsev A.V. et al. Bearing capacity of emergencyly loaded reinforced concrete columns with initial imperfections. Building and reconstruction. 2022. Vol. 104. No. 6. Pр. 104–115.
7. Alekseytsev A.V., Antonov M.D. Dynamics of reinforced concrete non-beam frames in case of damage to slabs punching. Building and reconstruction. 2021. Vol. 96. No. 4. Pр. 23–34.
8. Building Code of RF SP 296.1325800.2017 Buildings and structures. Accidental actions. With amendments 1, 2. Moscow: Standardinform, 2020.
9. CEN Comité Européen de Normalisation. EN 1991-1-7: eurocode 1 – actions on structures – part 1–7: general actions – accidental actions. Brussels (Belgium): CEN, 2006.
10. ASCE/SEI 7-10. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures / American Society of Civil Engineers. p. cm. - (ASCE standard.) “Revision of ASCE 7-10.” 2010. P. 658.
11. UFC. UFC 4-023-03. Design of Buildings To Resist Progressive Collapse // Design of Buildings To Resist Progressive Collapse. 2016. November. Pр. 34–37.
12. General services administration alternate path analysis & design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance approved for public release; distribution unlimited GSA Alternate Path Analysis and Design Guidelines for Progressive Collapse Resistance. 2013.
13. Building Code of RF SP 385.132580.2018 Protection of buildings and structures against progressive collapse. Design code. Basic statements. Moscow: Standardinform, 2018.
14. Kiakojouri F. et al. Progressive collapse of framed building structures: Current knowledge and future prospects. Eng Struct. 2020. Vol. 206. December 2019. P. 110061.
15. Tagel-Din H., Rahman N.A. Simulation of the Alfred P. Murrah federal building collapse due to blast loads. AEI 2006: Building Integration Solutions - Proceedings of the 2006 Architectural Engineering National Conference. 2006. Vol. 2006. P. 32.
16. Sadeghi A., Kazemi H., Samadi M. Reliability and reliability-based sensitivity analyses of steel momentresisting frame structure subjected to extreme actions. Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale. 2021. Vol. 15. No. 57.
17. Mirkarimi S.P., Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh E., Broujerdian V. Investigating the Progressive Collapse of Steel Frames Considering Vehicle Impact Dynamics. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Civil Engineering. 2022. Vol. 46. No. 6.
18. Sadeghi A. et al. Fragility analysis of steel moment-resisting frames subjected to impact actions. Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation. 2022. Vol. 7. No. 1.
19. Radwan M., Kövesdi B. Equivalent Geometric Imperfections for Local Buckling of Slender Box-section Columns. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering. 2021. Vol. 65. No. 4. Pр. 1279–1287.
20. Rzeszut K. Post-Buckling Behaviour of Steel Structures with Different Types of Imperfections. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 2022. Vol. 12. No. 18.
21. Alekseytsev A.V., Kurchenko N.S. Safety of Reinforced Concrete Columns: Effect of Initial Imperfections and Material Deterioration under Emergency Actions. Buildings. 2023. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 1054.
22. Brandis A., Kraus I., Petrovčič S. Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis and Its Application to Shallow Founded Buildings with Soil-Structure Interaction. Buildings. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 11.
23. Brandis A., Kraus I., Petrovčič S. Simplified numerical analysis of soil–structure systems subjected to monotonically increasing lateral load. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 2021. Vol. 11. No. 9.
24. Wei D., Suizi J. Restoring Force Model for Composite-Shear Wall with Concealed Bracings in Steel-Tube Frame. Buildings. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 9.
25. Forcellini D. A novel framework to assess soil structure interaction (Ssi) effects with equivalent fixedbased models. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 2021. Vol. 11. No. 21.
26. Alekseytsev A.V. Mechanical safety of reinforced concrete frames under complex emergency actions. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2021. Vol. 103. No. 3.
27. Ter-Martirosyan A.Z., Sidorov V.V. Features of Modeling the Operation of the Base under Dynamic Loads During the Operation of the Subway. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo. 2022. No. 12. Pр. 26–33.
Review
For citations:
Kurchenko N.S., Savin S.Yu. MODELING OF IMPACTS ON STEEL FRAMES OF BUILDINGS ON A DEFORMABLE SOIL BASE. Building and Reconstruction. 2023;(4):106-118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7416-2023-108-4-106-118
Views:
125
Email this article 