Causes of damage to masonry after restoration
https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7416-2022-99-1-48-58
Abstract
The article provides the analysis of the causes of damage in the masonry of historical buildings after their restoration. It has been established that the use of mortars of an increased grade and, accordingly, stiffness during repairs of historical masonry leads to an increase in tensile stresses in bricks under temperature and humidity effects. The reasoning behind the use of such mortars is to increase the strength and durability of the restored areas of historical masonry. The results of numerical simulation show that the masonry mortar must be sufficiently strong in compression and, at the same time, sufficiently plastic. It is shown that the use of hard mortars based on a cement binder, compared with plastic mortars based on a lime binder, on average doubles the value of normal tensile stresses at a temperature difference ΔТ=+100С.. This effect is much higher when stones swell due to their moisture. According to the results, for restoration work with brickwork, one should use mortars in accordance with the technology corresponding to this historical period, i.e., lime with additives that were identified during laboratory tests of samples taken from historical masonry. Low-grade mineral solutions with a low modulus of elasticity are preferable. It increases the crack resistance of the masonry under temperature and humidity effects. The article also shows that improper jointing of masonry joints facilitates the destruction of masonry. It happens when areas of accumulation of rainwater are formed, leading to increased wetting of stones in areas of direct impact of rainfall.
About the Authors
R. B. OrlovichRussian Federation
Orlovich Roman B. - doctor of technical science, Professor, Scientific consultant
Saint-Petersburg
А. S. Gorshkov
Russian Federation
Gorshkov Alexander S. - doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Intelligent Systems and Information Security
Saint-Petersburg
V. N. Derkach
Belarus
Derkach Valery N. - doctor of Technical Sciences, Director
Brest
S. S. Zimin
Russian Federation
Zimin Sergey S. - candidate of technical sciences, Associate Professor of the Institute of Civil Engineering
Saint-Petersburg
M. V. Grawit
Russian Federation
Grawit Marina V. - candidate of technical sciences, Associate Professor of the Institute of Civil Engineering
Saint-Petersburg
References
1. Domaclowski W., Lewandowska M., Lukaszewicz V. Badania nad konserwacja murow ceglanych [Research on the preservation of brick walls]. Torun, 2004. 210 p. (pol).
2. Gorchakov G.I. Koefficienty temperaturnogo rasshireniya i temperaturnye deformacii stroitel'nyh materialov [Coefficients of thermal expansion and thermal deformation of building materials]. M. : Izd-vo Komiteta standartov, mer i izmeritel'nyh priborov pri Sovmine SSSR, 1968. 165 p. (rus).
3. Orlovich R.B., Gorshkov A.S., Zimin S.S. Primenenie kamnej s vysokoj pustotnost'yu v oblicovochnom sloe mnogoslojnyh sten [Application of stones of high voidage in the facing layer of the multilayer walls]. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2013. No. 8 (43). Pp. 14-23. doi: 10.5862/MCE.43.3. (rus).
4. Serikhaliev S.B., Zimin S.S., Orlovich R.B. Defekty zashchitno-dekorativnoj kirpichnoj oblicovki fasadov karkasnyh zdanij [The defects of protective facing masonry of frame buildings]. Construction of Unique Buildings and Structures. 2014. No. 5 (20). Pp. 28-38. doi: 10.18720/CUBS.20.3. (rus).
5. Gorshkov A.S. Model' fizicheskogo iznosa stroitel'nyh konstrukcij [Physical deterioration model of building structures]. Building materials, equipment, technologies of the XXI century. 2014. No. 12 (191). Pp. 34-37. (rus).
6. Knat'ko M.V., Efimenko M.N., Gorshkov A.S. K voprosu o dolgovechnosti i energoeffektivnosti sovremennyh ograzhdayushchih stenovyh konstrukcij zhilyh, administrativnyh i proizvodstvennyh zdanij [On the issue of durability and energy efficiency of modern enclosing wall structures of residential, administrative and industrial buildings]. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2008. No. 2 (2). Pp. 50-53. doi: 10.18720/MCE.2.8. (rus).
7. Gorshkov A.S. Ocenka dolgovechnosti stenovoj konstrukcii na osnovanii laboratornyh i naturnyh ispytanij [Assessment of operating life of wall structure on the basis of laboratory and full-scale tests]. Construction materials. 2009. No. 8. Pp. 12-17. (rus).
8. Gorshkov A.S., Knat'ko M.V., Rymkevich P.P. Лабораторные и натурные исследования долговечности (эксплуатационного срока службы) стеновой конструкции из автоклавного газобетона с облицовочным слоем из силикатного кирпича [Laboratory and full-scale studies of durability (operational service life) of a wall structure from autoclaved aerated concrete with a facing layer from silicate brick] // Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2009. No. 8 (10). Pp. 20-26. doi: 10.18720/MCE.10.3. (rus).
9. Gorshkov A.S., Knat'ko M.V., Rymkevich P.P. Ocenka dolgovechnosti ograzhdayushchih konstrukcij zdanij [Assessment of the durability of building envelopes]. Strojprofile. 2009. No. 3. Pp. 7-8. (rus).
10. Derkach V.N., Demchuk I.E., Orlovich R.B. Mekhanizm povrezhdaemosti nenesushchej oblicovki mnogoslojnyh kamennyh sten [The mechanism of damage non-bearing facing multilayered masonry walls]. Construction of Unique Buildings and Structures. 2017. No. 3 (54). Pp. 63-70. doi: 10.18720/CUBS.54.5. (rus).
11. Onishchik L.I. Kamennye konstrukcii [Stone structures]. M.: Strojizdat, 1939. 208 p. (rus).
12. Polyakov S.V., Safargaliev S.M. Monolitnost' kamennoj kladki [Monolithic of masonry]. Alma-Ata: Gylym, 1991. 210 p. (rus).
13. Polyakov S.V. K voprosu scepleniya v kirpichnoj kladke [On the issue of adhesion in brickwork]. “Issledovaniya po kamennym konstrukciyam”: sb. statej pod nauchn. red. L.I. Onishchika [“Research on stone structures”: coll. of articles under scientific. ed. L.I. Onishchik]. M.: CNIISK, 1957. Pp. 298 ‒ 301. (rus).
14. Gur'ev V.V., Nikitin V.I., Kofanov V.A. Vliyanie kosogo dozhdya na vlagosoderzhanie ograzhdayushchih konstrukcij iz silikatnyh materialov [Influence of slanting rain on the moisture content of building envelopes made of silicate materials]. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel'stvo. 2016. No. 5. Pp. 15-21. (rus).
15. Ulybin A.V., Starcev S.A., Zubkov S.V. Kontrol' vlazhnosti pri obsledovanii kamennyh konstrukcij [Humidity control in the inspection of masonry structures]. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2013. No. 7. Pp. 32-39. doi: 10.5862/MCE.42.5. (rus).
16. Muryj M.A. Temperaturnye deformacii vlazhnoj kirpichnoj kladki [Temperature deformations of wet brickwork]. Vestnik TGASU. 2008. No. 1. Pp. 79-85. (rus).
17. Kornienko S.V. Harakteristiki sostoyaniya vlagi v materialah ograzhdayushchih konstrukcij zdanij [Characteristics of the state of moisture in the building envelope materials]. Construction materials. 2007. No. 4. Pp. 74-78. (rus).
18. Kornienko S.V. Potencial vlazhnosti dlya opredeleniya vlazhnostnogo sostoyaniya materialov naruzhnyh ograzhdenij v neizotermicheskih usloviyah [Humidity potential for determining the moisture condition of external fencing materials in non-isothermal conditions]. Construction materials. 2006. No. 4. Pp. 88-89. (rus).
19. Kornienko S.V., Vatin N.I., Gorshkov A.S. Оценка влажностного режима стен с фасадными теплоизоляционными композиционными системами [Assessment of moisture conditions of walls with faсade’s thermo-insulation composite]. Construction of Unique Buildings and Structures. 2016. No. 6 (45). Pp. 34-54. doi: 10.18720/CUBS.45.2. (rus).
20. Kornienko S.V., Vatin N.I., Petrichenro M.R., Gorshkov A.S. Ocenka vlazhnostnogo rezhima mnogoslojnoj stenovoj konstrukcii v godovom cikle [Evaluation of hygrothermal performance of multilayered wall design in annual cycle]. Construction of Unique Buildings and Structures. 2015. No. 6 (33). Pp. 19-33. doi: 10.18720/CUBS.33.2. (rus).
21. Lourenco P.B. Computational strategies for masonry structures: PhD Dissertation. Delfi: Delfi University Press, 1996. 210 p.
Review
For citations:
Orlovich R.B., Gorshkov А.S., Derkach V.N., Zimin S.S., Grawit M.V. Causes of damage to masonry after restoration. Building and Reconstruction. 2022;(1):48-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7416-2022-99-1-48-58