Urban planning concept of forming an architectural and spatial solution for an entrance sign to a small city
https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7416-2021-98-6-73-81
Abstract
Variants of architectural, spatial, and compositional solutions of entrance signs in small towns are considered. The article analyzes the features of architectural and artistic, structural, and compositional solutions of the entrance sign, as well as the use of finishing materials.
The urgency of development of small cities taking into account the historical, cultural, economic characteristics and achievements of the district, as well as symbols of culture and long history of the region in the context of solving problems of urban development.
The requirements for the assessment of each characteristic indicator that affects the identification of new architectural, artistic and aesthetic possibilities for the representation of the symbol at the entrance to a small city are given.
About the Authors
A. V. ShutkaRussian Federation
Shutka Anna V., PhD architecture, associate professor, associate professor of the department of urban planning
Voronezh
E. Iv. Gureva
Russian Federation
Gureva Elena Iv., PhD agricultural sciences, associate professor of urban planning
Voronezh
References
1. Avdeeva D.D. Entrance sign as an artistic embodiment of the image of the city in the collection: allRussian scientific and practical conference "disk-2018". Collection of materials. 2018. Pp. 4-6.
2. The "Smart city" standard has appeared in Russia [Electronic resource]. URL: https://minstroyrf.gov.ru/press/v-rossii-poyavilsya-standart-umnogo-goroda
3. Gureva E.I., Fedorova A.P. Gradoecological principles of development of the territory of the Kursk region on the example of the gorshechny district // academic Bulletin of Uralniiproekt RAASN. 2020. No. 2 (45). Pp. 44-49.
4. Gureva E.I., Yanshina N.A. Socio-psychological factors in urban planning policy on the example of the Voronezh agglomeration. 2019. No. 5 (85). Pp. 96-107.
5. Devyatov M.M., Volkov V.S., Gagulina O.V., Shchebetko D.A. Method of forming the architectural landscape and aesthetic appearance of the road to improve the convenience and safety of traffic . Vestnik VolgGASU. Ser.: Construction and architecture, 2020. No.1. Pp. 77-92.
6. Devyatov M. M., Oleynikov P. P. Formation of architectural dominant accents of a visa-oriented and Patriotic nature in the arrangement of highways. Bulletin of the Volgograd state University of architecture and civil engineering. Series: Construction and architecture. 2020. No. 2 (79). Рp. 32-46.
7. Moskalenko I. A. Stylistic features of eclecticism in the Central part of the city Of Rostov-on-don at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries // Engineering Bulletin of the don. 2013. No. 2.
8. Oleynikov P. P. Entrances to the city. History. The prospects // Project 34. 2008. No. 1. P. 6.
9. The government has odobreno draft transport strategy until 2035 [Electronic re-source]. URL:https://ria.ru/20200328/1569275325/html
10. Fedorov V.V. Symbolism of architectural spaces : author's thesis ... doctor of cultural Sciences. Moscow, 2000. P. 6-8.
11. Khuranov V. Kh., Bzhakhov M.I., Kardanov L.T., Shogenova F.M. Horseshoe - symbol of Nalchik in the architecture of the capital of the KBR Engineering Bulletin of the don. 2014. No. 4-1 (31). P. 124.
12. Shutka A.V. Landscape design of the festive environment of the city // In the collection: Innovations in the socio-cultural space: proceedings of the IX international scientific and practical conference: in 2 parts. 2016. Pp. 135-140.
13. Baier R., Ackva A., Baier M. Strassen und Plätze neu gestaltet : Beischpiele aus der Praxis Druckerei J. P. Bachem Gmbh, Köln, August. 2000.
14. Prinz D. Gestaltung von Strassen und Strassenräumen Städtebau. Städtebauliches Gestalten. Kohlhammer. Architektur. Aufgabe, 1997. Band 2.
15. Weise G., Durch W. Strassenbau: Planung und Entwurf. Berlin : Verl. fuer Bauwesen, 1997. 436 p
Review
For citations:
Shutka A.V., Gureva E.I. Urban planning concept of forming an architectural and spatial solution for an entrance sign to a small city. Building and Reconstruction. 2021;(6):73-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7416-2021-98-6-73-81