<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">construction</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Строительство и реконструкция</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Building and Reconstruction</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2073-7416</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Орловский государственный университет имени И.С. Тургенева</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33979/2073-7416-2024-115-5-4-22</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">construction-804</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ТЕОРИЯ ИНЖЕНЕРНЫХ СООРУЖЕНИЙ. СТРОИТЕЛЬНЫЕ КОНСТРУКЦИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THEORY OF ENGINEERING STRUCTURES. BUILDING UNITS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Оценка сейсмостойкости различных конструктивных решений типового железобетонного жилого здания нелинейным статическим и динамическим методами</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Seismic performance evaluation of different design options of typical reinforced concrete residential building by nonlinear static and dynamic analyses</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6932-2740</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Абаев</surname><given-names>З. К.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Abaev</surname><given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Абаев Заурбек Камболатович, кандидат технических наук, доцент, научный сотрудник комплексного научно-исследовательского отдела</p><p>г. Владикавказ</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Abaev Zaurbek K., Candidate of Technical Science, Researcher</p><p>Vladikavkaz</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">zaurbek_a@yahoo.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3416-3672</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дендуп</surname><given-names>Ц.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Dendup</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Дендуп Церинг, исполнительный инженер</p><p>г. Тхимпху</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dendup Tshering, Executive Engineer</p><p>Thimphu</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">tsheringdendup2@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГБУН «Владикавказский научный центр РАН»</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Vladikavkaz Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Министерство инфраструктуры и транспорта</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day><month>11</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>4</fpage><lpage>22</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Абаев З.К., Дендуп Ц., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Абаев З.К., Дендуп Ц.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Abaev Z.K., Dendup T.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://construction.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/804">https://construction.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/804</self-uri><abstract><p>Представлено сравнительное исследование сейсмостойкости типового пятиэтажного железобетонного жилого здания в г. Тхимпху, Бутан, спроектированного согласно старым и новым индийским нормам. Для анализа использовались две нелинейные модели объекта исследования, разработанные в программе STERA 3D. Оценка сейсмостойкости производилась с помощью метода спектра несущей способности (capacity spectrum method, CSM) и нелинейного анализа истории отклика (response history analysis, RHA) для трех записей землетрясений. Конструктивные повреждения элементов и этажей зданий, оцениваются с помощью индексов повреждаемости с использованием масштабированных записей землетрясений. Результаты показывают, что здания, спроектированные в соответствии с новыми индийскими нормами, обладают большей сейсмостойкостью по сравнению со зданиями, спроектированными в соответствии со старыми. Более того, оценка индексов повреждаемости для здания, спроектированного с использованием новых норм, показывает, что здание имеет более равномерное распределение повреждений по этажам и предотвращает конструктивные повреждения на уровне обрушения при рассматриваемом максимальном масштабном движении грунта.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>A comparative study on the seismic performances of typical five-story RC residential buildings designed with old and new Indian codes is presented. Accordingly, two three-dimensional models of a building designed with the old and new Indian codes are developed using STERA 3D software. The seismic performances are evaluated using the Capacity Spectrum Method (CSM) and non-linear Response History Analysis (RHA) for three input ground motions, in addition, the structural damage estimates given by damage indices are compared under scaled ground motions.</p><p>Results show that the building designed with the new Indian codes provide reduced structural responses when compared to that designed with old Indian codes. Furthermore, the assessment of the damage indices for the building designed using the new codes shows that the building has a more even damage dispersion over the floors and prevents collapse-level structural damage under the considered maximum scaled ground motion.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>оценка сейсмостойкости</kwd><kwd>нелинейный статический анализ</kwd><kwd>нелинейный динамический анализ</kwd><kwd>спектр несущей способности</kwd><kwd>индекс повреждаемости</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>seismic performance evaluation</kwd><kwd>nonlinear static analysis</kwd><kwd>response history analysis</kwd><kwd>capacity spectrum</kwd><kwd>damage index</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено при поддержке Российского научного фонда (проект № 24- 79-00087). Авторы выражают благодарность Японско-Российскому центру молодежных обменов (JREX), Японскому агентству международного сотрудничества (JICA) и Международному институту сейсмологии и сейсмостойкого строительства IISEE (г. Цукуба, Япония) за возможность академического и исследовательского сотрудничества.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Project No. 24-79-00087). The authors are grateful to the Japan-Russia Youth Exchange Center (JREX), the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), and the International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering IISEE (Tsukuba, Japan) for the opportunity of academic and research cooperation.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Le Roux-Mallouf R. et al. A 2600-year-long paleoseismic record for the Himalayan Main Frontal Thrust (western Bhutan) // Solid Earth. Copernicus Publications, 2020. Vol. 11, № 6. P. 2359–2375.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Le Roux-Mallouf R. et al. A 2600-year-long paleoseismic record for the Himalayan Main Frontal Thrust (western Bhutan). Solid Earth. Copernicus Publications, 2020. Vol. 11, № 6. P. 2359–2375. https://doi.org/10.5194/se11-2359-2020</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Debnath R., Halder L. A Comparative Study of the Seismic Provisions of Indian Seismic Code IS 1893- 2002 and Draft Indian Code IS 1893:2016 // Recent Advances in Structural Engineering, Volume 2 / ed. Rao A.R.M., Ramanjaneyulu K. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. Vol. 12. P. 151–160.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Debnath R., Halder L. A Comparative Study of the Seismic Provisions of Indian Seismic Code IS 1893- 2002 and Draft Indian Code IS 1893:2016. Recent Advances in Structural Engineering. Volume 2 / ed. Rao A.R.M., Ramanjaneyulu K. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. Vol. 12. P. 151–160. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-981-13-0365- 4_13</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Абаев З. К. Определение сейсмических сил в зданиях со стенами из природного камня в Федеративной Демократической Республике Непал, Российской Федерации и Республике Таджикистан / З. К. Абаев, М. Шилдкамп, А. Д. Валиев // Сейсмостойкое строительство. Безопасность сооружений. 2022. № 6. С. 18- 45.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abaev Z.K., Schildkamp M., Valiev A.D. Base shear seismic demand comparison for buildings with natural stone walls in Nepal, Russia and Tajikistan. Earthquake Engineering. Construction Safety. 2022. № 6. P. 18-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37153/2618-9283-2022-6-18-45</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aschheim M., Hernández-Montes E., Vamvatsikos D. Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings for Seismic Performance: Practical Deterministic and Probabilistic Approaches. Taylor &amp; Francis, 2016. 400 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aschheim M., Hernández-Montes E., Vamvatsikos D. Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings for Seismic Performance: Practical Deterministic and Probabilistic Approaches. Taylor &amp; Francis, 2016. 400 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аветисян Л.А., Скорняков Т.С. Оценка сейсмостойкости многоэтажного каркасного здания по Российским и Европейским нормативным документам // Строительство и реконструкция. 2018. № 1. С. 80–87.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Avetisyan L.A., Skornyakov T.S. Estimation of seismic resistance of multi-storey frame building according to Russian and European normative documents. Building and Reconstruction. 2018. № 1. P. 80-87. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бедов А.И., Николенко И.И. Обеспечение эксплуатационных характеристик железобетонных элементов каркасов зданий, подвергшихся сейсмическим воздействиям // Строительство и реконструкция. 2021. № 1. С. 3–15.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bedov A.I., Nikolenko I.I. Provision of operational characteristics of reinforced concrete elements of frames of buildings subjected to seismic effects. Building and Reconstruction. 2021. № 1. P. 3-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7416-2021-93-1-3-15</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aggarwal Y., Kulariya M., Saha S.K. Seismic performance evaluation of reinforced concrete hilly buildings under sequence of earthquakes // Structural Design Tall Build. 2024. Vol. 33, № 6. P. e2086.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aggarwal Y., Kulariya M., Saha S.K. Seismic performance evaluation of reinforced concrete hilly buildings under sequence of earthquakes. Structural Design Tall Build. 2024. Vol. 33, № 6. P. e2086. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.2086</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shegay A.V. et al. Evaluation of seismic residual capacity ratio for reinforced concrete structures // Resilient Cities and Structures. 2023. Vol. 2, № 1. P. 28–45.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shegay A.V. et al. Evaluation of seismic residual capacity ratio for reinforced concrete structures. Resilient Cities and Structures. 2023. Vol. 2, № 1. P. 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2023.02.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fajfar P. A Practical Nonlinear Method for Seismic Performance Evaluation // Advanced Technology in Structural Engineering. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2000. P. 1–8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fajfar P. A Practical Nonlinear Method for Seismic Performance Evaluation. Advanced Technology in Structural Engineering. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2000. P. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/40492(2000)125</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Абаев З. К. Оценка сейсмостойкости многоэтажного жилого здания с фрикционномаятниковыми опорами на примере Индонезии / З. К. Абаев, Ф. Султан // Строительная механика инженерных конструкций и сооружений. 2024. Т. 20. № 1. С. 57–72.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abaev Z.K., Sulthan F. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Multi-Storey Residential Building with Friction Pendulum Bearings: Indonesia case study. Structural Mechanics of Engineering Constructions and Buildings. 2024.Vol. 20. № 1. P. 57–72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/1815-5235-2024-20-1-57-72</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baek H.-J. et al. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Retrofitted with a New Concrete Filled Tube Composite Strengthening System // Applied Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13, № 24. P. 13231.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baek H.-J. et al. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Retrofitted with a New Concrete Filled Tube Composite Strengthening System. Applied Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13, № 24. P. 13231. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132413231</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Naeem A., Koichi K., Lee J. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Building Structure Retrofitted with Self-Centering Disc-Slit Damper and Conventional Steel Slit Damper // Buildings. 2024. Vol. 14, № 3. P. 795.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Naeem A., Koichi K., Lee J. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Building Structure Retrofitted with Self-Centering Disc-Slit Damper and Conventional Steel Slit Damper. Buildings. 2024. Vol. 14, № 3. P. 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030795</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harrington C.C., Liel A.B. Indicators of improvements in seismic performance possible through retrofit of reinforced concrete frame buildings // Earthquake Spectra. 2021. Vol. 37, № 1. P. 262–283. 14. Абаев З. К. Разработка рекомендаций по реализации политики снижения сейсмического риска в Российской Федерации на основе мирового опыта / З. К. Абаев, А. Д. Валиев, М. Ю. Кодзаев // Сейсмостойкое строительство. Безопасность сооружений. 2023. № 3. С. 48-72.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harrington C.C., Liel A.B. Indicators of improvements in seismic performance possible through retrofit of reinforced concrete frame buildings. Earthquake Spectra. 2021. Vol. 37, № 1. P. 262–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020936707</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Manfredi V. et al. Selection and spectral matching of recorded ground motions for seismic fragility analyses // Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 2022. Vol. 20, № 10. P. 4961–4987.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abaev Z., Valiev A., Kodzaev M. Development of recommendations for the implementation of seismic risk mitigation policy in the Russian Federation based on world experience. Earthquake Engineering Construction Safety. 2023. № 3. P. 48–72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37153/2618-9283-2023-3-48-72</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data USGS. Режим доступа: https://www.strongmotioncenter.org (дата обращения: 14.05.2024).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Manfredi V. et al. Selection and spectral matching of recorded ground motions for seismic fragility analyses. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 2022. Vol. 20, № 10. P. 4961–4987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01393-0</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Earthquake Disaster Engineering Research Laboratory. Software STERA 3D. Режим доступа: https://rc.ace.tut.ac.jp/saito/software-e.html (дата обращения: 14.05.2024).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data USGS. Available from: https://www.strongmotioncenter.org (Accessed: 14.05.2024).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kitamura H., Miyauchi Y., Uramoto H. Study on Standards for Judging Structural Performances in Seismic Performance Based Design: Evaluation of the safety limit value and margin I and II levels in JSCA seismic performance menu // Transactions of AIJ. 2006. Vol. 71, № 604. P. 183–191.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Earthquake Disaster Engineering Research Laboratory. Software STERA 3D. Available from: https://rc.ace.tut.ac.jp/saito/software-e.html (Accessed: 14.05.2024).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Freeman S.A. The capacity spectrum method as a tool for seismic design // Proceedings of the 11th European conference on earthquake engineering. Citeseer, 1998. P. 6–11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kitamura H., Miyauchi Y., Uramoto H. Study on Standards for Judging Structural Performances in Seismic Performance Based Design: Evaluation of the safety limit value and margin I and II levels in JSCA seismic performance menu. Transactions of AIJ. 2006. Vol. 71, № 604. P. 183–191. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.71.183_1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Park Y., Ang A.H. ‐S. Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete // Journal of Structural Engineering. 1985. Vol. 111, № 4. P. 722–739. 21. Pradhan S., Li Y., Sanada Y. Seismic performance evaluation and risk assessment of typical reinforced concrete frame buildings with masonry infill and conventional vertical extension in Nepal // Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 2022. Vol. 20, № 2. P. 853–884.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Freeman S.A. The capacity spectrum method as a tool for seismic design. Proceedings of the 11th European conference on earthquake engineering. Citeseer, 1998. P. 6–11.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhao J. et al. Seismic performance evaluation of different strategies for retrofitting RC frame buildings // Structures. 2021. Vol. 34. P. 2355–2366.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Park Y., Ang A.H. ‐S. Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering. 1985. Vol. 111, № 4. P. 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nakano Y. et al. Guideline for post-earthquake damage evaluation and rehabilitation of RC buildings in Japan // 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver BC, Canada, 2004. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 124.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pradhan S., Li Y., Sanada Y. Seismic performance evaluation and risk assessment of typical reinforced concrete frame buildings with masonry infill and conventional vertical extension in Nepal. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 2022. Vol. 20, № 2. P. 853–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01246-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhao J. et al. Seismic performance evaluation of different strategies for retrofitting RC frame buildings. Structures. 2021. Vol. 34. P. 2355–2366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.016</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhao J. et al. Seismic performance evaluation of different strategies for retrofitting RC frame buildings. Structures. 2021. Vol. 34. P. 2355–2366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.016</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nakano Y. et al. Guideline for post-earthquake damage evaluation and rehabilitation of RC buildings in Japan. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver BC, Canada, 2004. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 124.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nakano Y. et al. Guideline for post-earthquake damage evaluation and rehabilitation of RC buildings in Japan. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver BC, Canada, 2004. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 124.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
